• Tired of adverts on RWI? - Subscribe by clicking HERE and PMing Trailboss for instructions and they will magically go away!

QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-00281

R
Joined
01/01/26
Messages
30
Thread starter

A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?

Discussion record: RWI-00281.

B
Joined
01/01/26
Messages
26

Start with function, legibility, assembly and clear visible damage. Explain what the full-size image shows, what the crop adds and what remains uncertain; do not turn an overlay into an automatic verdict.

C
Joined
01/01/26
Messages
28

Clarification for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: the point beginning “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” belongs to the question as written. It should not be read as a report that a new check, purchase or experiment has been completed. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.

C
Joined
01/01/26
Messages
24

Method note for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: use “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.

You must log in or register to reply here. Log in