RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-12289
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-12289 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-12289
Case 46 — Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent · source wording exercise
Two glowing dials are shown with different camera exposure and unknown charging time. What can the images establish?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Repeat with equal light source, charging duration, elapsed time and camera…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RWI-12289/46: address this question within its stated limits.