RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-10829
Home › Forums › Brand Specific Discussions and Technical Questions › Reviews and brand information › Member’s Watch Reviews › QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-10829 › RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-10829
January 17, 2021 at 9:34 am
#86404
CaseFile 03263
Participant
Method note for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: use “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.