RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-10625
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-10625 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-10625
December 30, 2020 at 10:12 pm
#84939
PartsReader 01798
Participant
Case 30 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Method note for “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: use “No single lighting setup settles…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.