RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-09822
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-09822 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-09822
October 10, 2020 at 11:20 am
#77796
MovementIndex 04655
Participant
Case 36 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.