RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09593
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09593 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09593
September 15, 2020 at 6:43 am
#76006
MovementIndex 02865Participant
Case 18 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Summary draft for “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: the answer addresses “No single lighting setup settles…”; the related point is “Compare multiple controlled angles and describe the visible observation without asserting…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.