RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09357
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09357 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-09357
August 21, 2020 at 12:05 pm
#72276
MovementIndex 09135
Participant
Case 2 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Limit of the answer in “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: “No single lighting setup settles…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.