RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405
February 28, 2018 at 3:03 am
#6953
Participant
Case 31 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.