RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00393
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00393 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00393
February 24, 2018 at 8:48 am
#6330
TimingNotes 03189
Participant
Case 7 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.
Exercise RWI-00393/7: address this question within its stated limits.