RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-06689
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-06689 › RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-06689
November 24, 2019 at 11:03 am
#52120
TimingNotes 08979
Participant
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.