RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05465
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05465 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05465
July 23, 2019 at 10:05 pm
#43902
BenchNotes 00761
Participant
Case 6 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Limit of the answer in “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: “No single lighting setup settles…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.