RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05461
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05461 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05461
July 24, 2019 at 1:06 am
#43614
CaseFile 00473
Participant
Case 15 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.