RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038
June 13, 2019 at 1:45 pm
#40729
PartsReader 07588
Participant
Case 32 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.