RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-21617
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-21617 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-21617
January 18, 2024 at 5:46 am
#175313
Participant
Case 18 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Limit of the answer in “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: “No single lighting setup settles…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.