RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01505
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01505 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01505
June 18, 2018 at 9:18 am
#16768
QCNotebook 03627Participant
Case 11 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.