RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
August 3, 2023 at 9:37 am
#161369
PartsReader 08228
Participant
Case 23 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.