RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829
July 19, 2023 at 3:39 pm
#160544
CaseFile 07403
Participant
Case 11 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.