RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19829
July 19, 2023 at 2:35 pm
#160540
TimingNotes 07399Participant
Case 11 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.
Exercise RWI-19829/11: address this question within its stated limits.