RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-18141
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-18141 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-18141
January 30, 2023 at 12:06 am
#145039
PartsReader 01898
Participant
Case 15 — Accuracy expectations: is -8 s/d acceptable on an entry-level automatic?
Start with how you measured it. Comparing against a phone clock once a day for a week, at the same time, and noting the offset is reliable enough. One 24-hour reading isn't, because rate depends on wrist time, position overnight and state of wind. Average across several days before deciding anything.