RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-14062
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-14062 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-14062
December 12, 2021 at 3:48 am
#110549
Participant
Case 8 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
Method note for “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: use “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record. Put the statement, its supporting source or measurement, and any unresolved detail in separate fields. This proposes a format; it supplies no additional evidence. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.