RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13525
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13525 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13525
October 19, 2021 at 1:53 am
#106982
BenchNotes 03841
Participant
Case 15 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.
Exercise RWI-13525/15: address this question within its stated limits.