RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13517
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13517 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-13517
Case 42 — Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent · source wording exercise
Reader check for “Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent”: distinguish the discussion point “Repeat with equal light source, charging duration, elapsed time and camera…” from its proposed application. The thread offers a way to reason about the question, without adding a personal experience or a newly observed outcome. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.