RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00645
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00645 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00645
March 25, 2018 at 6:14 am
#9562
BenchNotes 06421
Participant
Case 33 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.