RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-00405
February 27, 2018 at 3:53 am
#6883
CaliberReader 03742
Participant
Case 21 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.