RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05273
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05273 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-05273
July 5, 2019 at 12:25 pm
#41767
ServiceLedger 08626
Participant
Case 18 — Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test
Limit of the answer in “Crystal reflections: why a dark patch is not a coating test”: “No single lighting setup settles…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: scope. Keep the stated question separate from any broader claim.