RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-05038
June 13, 2019 at 11:45 am
#40725
Participant
Case 32 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?
Exercise RWI-05038/32: address this question within its stated limits.