RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-04953
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-04953 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-04953
June 3, 2019 at 4:06 am
#39701
ReferenceLog 06560Participant
Case 19 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.
Exercise RWI-04953/19: address this question within its stated limits.