RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-28409
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-28409 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-28409
Case 41 — Model comparison: dive bezel action and alignment, how to compare fairly · source wording exercise
People keep comparing the bezels on two similar dive-style watches. One is called crisp, the other mushy, and alignment complaints come up for both. What would a fair comparison look like, and what is actually a defect versus a preference?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Crisp vs mushy is mostly about…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RWI-28409/41: address this question within its stated limits.