RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-28278
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › Main Forum – General Discussion and Forum info › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-28278 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-28278
Case 48 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · source wording exercise
A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “Explain what the full-size image shows, what the crop adds and…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RWI-28278/48: address this question within its stated limits.