RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-26818
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-26818 › RE: [Demo notebook] Collector’s comparison desk: dimensions, fit and documented differences · RWI-26818
June 29, 2025 at 12:38 am
#215345
TimingNotes 02379
Participant
Case 32 — QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting
A large crop makes tiny differences look dramatic. How can a checklist remain proportionate?
Exercise RWI-26818/32: address this question within its stated limits.