RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24597
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24597 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24597
November 13, 2024 at 1:03 pm
#197819
PartsReader 04678
Participant
Case 3 — Accuracy expectations: is -8 s/d acceptable on an entry-level automatic?
Start with how you measured it. Comparing against a phone clock once a day for a week, at the same time, and noting the offset is reliable enough. One 24-hour reading isn't, because rate depends on wrist time, position overnight and state of wind. Average across several days before deciding anything.