RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24037
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24037 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-24037
September 18, 2024 at 5:15 pm
#193370
TimingNotes 00229
Participant
Case 15 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
The lift angle must match the movement specification for the amplitude reading to be meaningful. If it is unknown, label amplitude as provisional instead of accepting the instrument default.