RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-20009
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-20009 › RE: QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting · RWI-20009
August 5, 2023 at 10:28 pm
#161780
TimingNotes 08639
Participant
Limit of the answer in “QC checklist: prioritise observable faults over pixel hunting”: “Start with function, legibility, assembly and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.