RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
August 5, 2023 at 5:54 am
#161503
Participant
Case 42 — Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent · source wording exercise
Summary draft for “Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent”: the answer addresses “Repeat with equal light source, charging duration, elapsed time and camera…”; the related point is “Treat the comparison…”. Keep both connected to the opening question, and mark any conclusion needing further records as unresolved. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.