RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
August 5, 2023 at 5:32 am
#161501
ReferenceLog 08360
Participant
Case 42 — Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent · source wording exercise
Limit of the answer in “Lume comparison: keep exposure and charging conditions consistent”: “Repeat with equal light source, charging duration, elapsed time and camera…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an independent verification. A reader needs the relevant original material before treating an interpretation as established. Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase.