RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-19961
August 4, 2023 at 5:10 pm
#161463
CaliberReader 08322
Participant
Case 37 — What a water-resistance claim does and does not establish · source wording exercise
A listing describes a water-resistance rating but provides no test record for the individual watch. What evidence would address the gap?
Review focus: source wording. Retain the source wording beside any paraphrase. Use the original answer fragment “A photograph or a caseback engraving is not…” as the discussion anchor; no new event or result is supplied.
Exercise RWI-19961/37: address this question within its stated limits.