RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01385
Home › Forums › News and General Discussion › New Members Area › [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01385 › RE: [Demo notebook] QC clinic: photographic evidence and its limits · RWI-01385
June 6, 2018 at 1:36 pm
#16039
PartsReader 02898
Participant
Case 23 — Timegrapher reading context: what do rate, amplitude and beat error actually tell me?
I ran a watch on a basic timegrapher and got +6 s/d, 245 degrees amplitude and 0.8 ms beat error, dial up, about an hour after winding. Is this good, bad or normal? I don't want to send it for service on a single reading.
Exercise RWI-01385/23: address this question within its stated limits.